Jeni's Musings

While the one-named-graph-per-doc seems a lot more elegant (because you just name the single doc/graph with a HTTP URI and lots of things work), I think the multiple-… is probably necessary. Compare blog front pages or RSS/Atom feeds - multiple nameable (permalinkable) chunks within a single doc. Big drawback with HTML is what happens when you pull the chunks out from the doc wrapper, losing the html:head (Atom allows individual entries to exist as first-class named entities too, smart move).

Dunno how well Toby’s spec handles this aspect, but on a skim it generally looked promising.