- markup (52)
- xml (7)
- xslt (21)
- atom (8)
- overlapping markup (2)
- schema (9)
- creole (4)
- xforms (1)
- pipelines (7)
- coding (2)
- dtll (1)
- genealogy (3)
- gtd (1)
- hardware (1)
- legislation (1)
- ontologies (2)
- unicode (1)
- web (24)
- google (3)
- rdf (6)
- rest (3)
- wikis (1)
- work (1)
- xpath (1)
- xquery (1)
- xtech2008 (3)
- life (26)
- children (5)
- equality (6)
- environment (4)
- gadgets (5)
- software (3)
- xlinq (2)
- conferences (7)
- xtech (6)
- blog (7)
- drupal (3)
Recent posts
- 9 weeks 5 days ago
- 10 weeks 4 days ago
- 10 weeks 5 days ago
- 12 weeks 1 day ago
- 14 weeks 14 hours ago
Recent comments
- x-user (not verified)
- picture frames (not verified)
- Digital frame (not verified)
- digital frames (not verified)
- bodrum (not verified)
Re: RDFa, sure, but now?
Jeni,
As I really like what you do here (and as a matter of coincidence being responsible for the RDFa Test Cases) I wonder who told you that RDFa is XHTML 2.0-only …
Actually, the current spec [1] targets at XHTML 1, along with the Test Cases [2]. You may also wish to check the availability for other members of the HTML family [3] …
Please, in case you need any support, let me know :)
Cheers, Michael
[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/syntax/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/ [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFaInHTML