- markup (52)
- xml (7)
- xslt (21)
- atom (8)
- overlapping markup (2)
- schema (9)
- creole (4)
- xforms (1)
- pipelines (7)
- coding (2)
- dtll (1)
- genealogy (3)
- gtd (1)
- hardware (1)
- legislation (1)
- ontologies (2)
- unicode (1)
- web (24)
- google (3)
- rdf (6)
- rest (3)
- wikis (1)
- work (1)
- xpath (1)
- xquery (1)
- xtech2008 (3)
- life (26)
- children (5)
- equality (6)
- environment (4)
- gadgets (5)
- software (3)
- xlinq (2)
- conferences (7)
- xtech (6)
- blog (7)
- drupal (3)
Recent posts
- 9 weeks 5 days ago
- 10 weeks 4 days ago
- 10 weeks 4 days ago
- 12 weeks 1 day ago
- 14 weeks 4 hours ago
Recent comments
- x-user (not verified)
- picture frames (not verified)
- Digital frame (not verified)
- digital frames (not verified)
- bodrum (not verified)
Re: RDFa, sure, but now?
That’s right…and in addition to the DTDs there are also XML Schemas that conform to the XHTML Modularisation architecture.
In terms of the main points—is RDFa stable enough?—I think for most uses that RDFa would be put to, it is certainly stable enough, and has been so for quite a while. I hold my hands up and say that we haven’t been very good at keeping people up-to-date with developments as they happen, but we’re closing in on final drafts now, and the kinds of things that might still change are the sorts of things that would rarely be used anyway.
It would be a shame if Jeni didn’t make use of RDFa, purely because she wasn’t sure how things were progressing—if it wasn’t suitable that would be fair enough—so please do keep me posted of your progress, and if there’s anything I can do to help your decision-making, I will.
All the best,
Mark
— Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer
mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com
standards. innovation.