- markup (76)
- xml (11)
- xslt (23)
- pipelines (8)
- atom (9)
- overlapping markup (6)
- schema (11)
- creole (5)
- dtll (1)
- xforms (1)
- xpath (1)
- xquery (2)
- coding (2)
- datagovuk (1)
- genealogy (4)
- hardware (1)
- linked data (16)
- modelling (1)
- named graphs (1)
- opendata (1)
- provenance (1)
- psi (3)
- skos (1)
- sparql (4)
- Talis (7)
- unicode (1)
- uri (4)
- versioning (1)
- visualisation (6)
- web (78)
- google (4)
- html5 (5)
- jQuery (2)
- rdf (46)
- ontologies (2)
- rdfa (8)
- rdfQuery (5)
- rest (6)
- wikis (1)
- work (3)
- legislation (2)
- xmlsummerschool09 (2)
- life (28)
- children (5)
- equality (6)
- gtd (1)
- environment (4)
- gadgets (5)
- software (3)
- xlinq (2)
- conferences (11)
- ukgc09 (1)
- xtech (9)
- xtech2008 (3)
- blog (8)
- drupal (3)
Re: Web 2.0 project: RDF and uncertainty
Finally got around to blogging this -
http://danbri.org/words/2009/01/18/390 Re claims/evidence design, see http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG/SWANSIOC for efforts on modelling scientific discourse.
And w.r.t. modelling ‘personas’ (occurances of people), there’s a series of posts around http://www.r4isstatic.com/?p=26#comments that describe efforts at the bbc to describe fictional people and works of fiction. While this might seem another problem (and it is!) there are some common themes - for example picking out occurances of the same real-world person even when they occur in a work of fiction (eg. Mark Twain in Star Wars). This needs some way of saying “these layers of data don’t directly describe the world, they describe the world-according-to-some-text” (or “content”, or whatever). But doing so in a way where the entity identifiers can still be cross-referenced with other sources.