- markup (76)
- xml (11)
- xslt (23)
- pipelines (8)
- atom (9)
- overlapping markup (6)
- schema (11)
- creole (5)
- dtll (1)
- xforms (1)
- xpath (1)
- xquery (2)
- coding (2)
- datagovuk (1)
- genealogy (4)
- hardware (1)
- linked data (16)
- modelling (1)
- named graphs (1)
- opendata (1)
- provenance (1)
- psi (3)
- skos (1)
- sparql (4)
- Talis (7)
- unicode (1)
- uri (4)
- versioning (1)
- visualisation (6)
- web (78)
- google (4)
- html5 (5)
- jQuery (2)
- rdf (46)
- ontologies (2)
- rdfa (8)
- rdfQuery (5)
- rest (6)
- wikis (1)
- work (3)
- legislation (2)
- xmlsummerschool09 (2)
- life (28)
- children (5)
- equality (6)
- gtd (1)
- environment (4)
- gadgets (5)
- software (3)
- xlinq (2)
- conferences (11)
- ukgc09 (1)
- xtech (9)
- xtech2008 (3)
- blog (8)
- drupal (3)
Re: Metadata about RDF triples: reification and Linked Data
Many thanks, Danny. Named graphs as in TriX give me a nice warm feeling; the Linked Data method I described in this post, of using the URI at which triples are found is then a default rather than the only method of naming a graph.
I also found TriG for a Turtle-based readable syntax, which is pleasing.
So what I’m missing now is a way to name graphs in RDFa. A
graphattribute holding a URIorCURIE should do it, with the nearestgraphto a triple determining which graph it belongs to…(I don’t think n-ary relations are right for statements-about-statements; I’m not prepared to stretch the model that far!)