- markup (52)
- xml (7)
- xslt (21)
- atom (8)
- overlapping markup (2)
- schema (9)
- creole (4)
- xforms (1)
- pipelines (7)
- coding (2)
- dtll (1)
- genealogy (3)
- gtd (1)
- hardware (1)
- legislation (1)
- ontologies (2)
- unicode (1)
- web (24)
- google (3)
- rdf (6)
- rest (3)
- wikis (1)
- work (1)
- xpath (1)
- xquery (1)
- xtech2008 (3)
- life (26)
- children (5)
- equality (6)
- environment (4)
- gadgets (5)
- software (3)
- xlinq (2)
- conferences (7)
- xtech (6)
- blog (6)
- drupal (3)
Re: Women at XTech 2008
As you know, XTech has a double-blind peer-review process. If anything, proportionally more papers from women get accepted. It is a disappointing number, I agree.
There are some things I could do to encourage submissions from women that I’ve failed to do this year. Most obvious would be to have more women on the programme committee — there are currently none.
I’d be interested in continuing this conversation in person, looking at practical things we might do.
As a final exercise, it would be interesting to know what proportion of commenters on your blog are women?